August 13,5: Just to push back on that theme, however, it is worth remenbering that not all political regimes were created equal.
The dictation[ edit ] According to Crowley, the first appearance of Aiwass was during the Three Days of the writing of Liber al vel Legis. His first and only identification as such is in Chapter I: Har-par-khered is more commonly referred to by the Greek transliteration Harpocratesmeaning "Horus the Child", whom Crowley considered to be the central deity within the Thelemic cosmology see: The Voice of Aiwass came apparently from over my left shoulder, from the furthest corner of the room.
It seemed to echo itself in my physical heart in a very strange manner, hard to describe. I have noticed a similar phenomenon when I have been waiting for a message fraught with great hope or dread.
The voice was passionately poured, as if Aiwass were alert about the time-limit The voice was of deep timbre, musical and expressive, its tones solemn, voluptuous, tender, fierce or aught else as suited the moods of the message.
The English was free of either native or foreign accent, perfectly pure of local or caste mannerisms, thus startling and even uncanny at first hearing.
I had a strong impression that the speaker was actually in the corner where he seemed to be, in a body of "fine matter," transparent as a veil of gauze, or a cloud of incense-smoke.
He seemed to be a tall, dark man in his thirties, well-knit, active and strong, with the face of a savage king, and eyes veiled lest their gaze should destroy what they saw. The dress was not Arab; it suggested Assyria or Persia, but very vaguely. I took little note Essays on alistair smith it, for to me at that time Aiwass was an "angel" such as I had often seen in visions, a being purely astral.
Identity[ edit ] Crowley went to great pains to argue that Aiwass was an objectively separate being from himself, possessing far more knowledge than he or any other human could possibly have.
He wrote "no forger could have prepared so complex a set of numerical and literal puzzles". The existence of true religion presupposes that of some discarnate intelligence, whether we call him God or anything else. And this is exactly what no religion had ever proved scientifically.
And this is what The Book of the Law does prove by internal evidence, altogether independent of any statement of mine. This proof is evidently the most important step in science that could possibly be made: The immense superiority of this particular intelligence, AIWASS, to any other with which mankind has yet been in conscious communication is shown not merely by the character of the book itself, but by the fact of his comprehending perfectly the nature of the proof necessary to demonstrate the fact of his own existence and the conditions of that existence.
And, further, having provided the proof required. In The Law is for All,  he goes on at length in comparison to various other deities and spiritual concepts, but most especially to The Fool. For example, he writes of Aiwass: Thus we see him as the Great Fool of Celtic legend, the Pure Fool of Act I of Parsifal, and, generally speaking, the insane person whose words have always been taken for oracles.
Again from Equinox of the Gods: He is not, let me say with emphasis, a mere abstraction from yourself; and that is why I have insisted rather heavily that the term 'Higher Self' implies 'a damnable heresy and a dangerous delusion'.
Occultist Israel Regardie argued for this view in his Crowley biography, The Eye in the Triangle, and considered that The Book of the Law was a "colossal wish fulfillment" on Crowley's part. My 'conscience' is really an obstacle and a delusion, being a survival of heredity and education. In The Book of the Law the wish is fulfilled.
Cammell, author of Aleister Crowley: The Man, the Mage, the Poet  also wrote that The Book of the Law was "in part but in part only an emanation from Crowley's unconscious mind I can believe; for it bears a likeness to his own Daemonic personality. Ah, you realize that magick is something we do to ourselves.
But it is more convenient to assume the objective existence of an angel who gives us new knowledge than to allege that our invocation has awakened a supernormal power in ourselves.
Kaczynski,  A number of authors such as Israel Regardie,  Sarah Veale,  and academic Joshua Gunn  have argued that the stylistic similarities between The Book of the Law and Crowley's other writings are evidence that Crowley rather than a discarnate entity was the sole source of the book.
Occultist Michael Aquino of the Temple of Set also believed on esoteric grounds that Aiwass was probably "a subjective idealization of Crowley's own personality". Aquino does not believe in the objective existence of Hoor-pa-kraat, hence he considers the objective authenticity of Aiwass "doubtful" although he did consider The Book an "inspired utterance".
Gematria[ edit ] Crowley, being the Qabalist that he was, labored to discover Aiwass's number within the system of gematria. Initially he believed that it was Jacobs whose Golden Eagle Press published the work of e.
To Crowley's astonishment and delight, it was OIVZ, which equated to 93the number of Thelema itself, and "also that of the Lost Word of freemasonrywhich I had re-discovered".
However, when Crowley decided to use the Greek Qabalah, he discovered that. It represents the practice of the Book as 93 does the theory. He is not content to give one spelling of his name, however potent; he gives two which taken together are not merely twice as significant as either alone, but more so, in a degree which is beyond me to calculate.
The Book of the Law. Red Wheel Weiser Centennial edition,p.Aiwass /aye-wazz/ [p] is the name given to a voice that English occultist Aleister Crowley claimed to have heard on April 8, 9, and 10 in Crowley claimed that this voice, which he considered originated with a non-corporeal intelligence, dictated The Book of the Law (or Liber Legis) to him.
Sir Thomas More educational material resource center for teachers and scholars. Online library of More’s complete works, scholarship on Thomas More, and historical and biographical information, concordances, artwork, photos, images and lesson plans relating to the life of Thomas More.
New Criticism. A literary movement that started in the late s and s and originated in reaction to traditional criticism that new critics saw as largely concerned with matters extraneous to the text, e.g., with the biography or psychology of the author or the work's relationship to literary history.
Jun 10, · Bruce Bueno de Mesquita and Alastair Smith are professors of politics at New York University and the authors of “The Dictator’s Handbook.”. Alistair Smith is a leading trainer in modern learning methods and his techniques are used with startling success by thousands of teachers and parents in the UK and abroad.
He is the chairperson of Alite;. It seems that truth has become a somewhat dirty word, or at least a corrupted one.
In its place we are left with a whole lot of uncertainty.